Chapter Fifteen
The Exception You Granted Yourself
Do other people’s rights change when your argument changes?
In spring, Karim was home for the weekend. At noon on Friday he rode with his father to the mosque. They were late. When they arrived, the preacher’s voice was already coming through the loudspeaker. His father could not find a parking space. He stopped in the middle of the narrow street near the mosque, leaving no room for another car to pass. He switched off the engine. “A few minutes, and we’ll be back,” he said. Karim knew that his father’s “few minutes” on Fridays could fit the sermon, the prayer, and greetings to half the neighborhood.
They got out and walked toward the door. A white car reached his father’s car and stopped. There was no way through in front of it, and another car behind it prevented it from reversing. Its driver gave one short honk, then a long one. Karim turned. His father had reached the mosque door and bent to take off his shoes.
Karim wanted to say, “Dad, the car is blocking the road.” But his father was on the mosque doorstep, and the preacher was speaking. If he said it now, it would sound like an objection to the prayer itself, rather than to the car. He stayed silent and took off his shoes beside his father’s. A third honk came from the street.
You may know this discomfort: you see an action that harms someone else, done for a noble reason, and stay silent so your objection to the action will not seem like an objection to something you love. You may also be the person doing it. The car blocks the road. Does the argument change the rights of those waiting behind it, or merely improve its owner’s image of himself?
The Argument That Changed the Question
The father keeps one appointment, then makes an exception to another person’s rights when he benefits. This is the action we are examining. We do not need a judgment on his whole life.
“It’s worship, so it’s all right.” This is motivated reasoning: looking for something to justify your choice instead of examining it. It shifts the question from whether people can get through to how worthy your purpose is. A worthy purpose does not clear the road or give back the waiting person’s time.
Moral licensing means using credit from an action you value to give yourself permission for another mistake: “I pray, so I’m entitled to…” This is not a diagnosis of the father or of everyone who prays. We are examining whether he took someone else’s rights into account in this situation.
The lawyer may say that everyone does it, or that space is tight. Repetition does not grant permission. Limited space does not make it the other driver’s job to solve the problem at the expense of his own time. What can be corrected is where the car stands and when you leave.
When Someone Else Does It
Ask, “If someone else did this for a worldly reason, would I accept it?” Imagine the same car outside a shop, its owner saying he will be quick buying what he needs. If you would object, what has changed here apart from the story you tell about yourself? The question brings the right back into focus after the argument has obscured it.
You might take someone else’s turn because your appointment matters, or delay repaying a debt and then mention your charity. Every situation has its circumstances. The question remains: Who bears the cost of my choice, and did they agree to it?
You can object to an action without putting the faith of the person who did it on trial. He can correct it without denying the worship he loves. Defending an entire identity may obscure a small mistake that can be repaired.
A Place Where People Sit
Abu Sa‘id al-Khudri relates that the Prophet ﷺ forbade sitting in the roads. The companions said they had gathering places there where they talked. The reply came: “If you insist on sitting there, give the road its rights.” They asked what its rights were. Lowering the gaze, refraining from harm, returning greetings, enjoining good, and forbidding wrong were named1.
The story does not stop with the people’s need for a place to sit. It moves to the rights of those who pass them. The gathering serves a purpose for its members, but that purpose does not make the road their property.
A gathering and a car are different. In both cases, we look through the eyes of the person affected. Worship does not cancel people’s rights. Removing harm from the road is itself a branch of faith: “And the humblest of them is the removal of what is injurious from the path.”2.
The Reversed Question
When to use it: When you hear yourself excusing an action that harms someone else by pointing to a purpose you love.
- Describe the action without the justification: a car blocking a road, or a turn you took from someone else.
- Name the person bearing its cost, and what they lost because of it.
- Reverse the situation: If someone else did this for a worldly reason, would I accept it?
- Correct what you can now, and decide on an arrangement for the next appointment that prevents it from happening again.
Time needed: Two minutes to examine it, then begin whatever correction is possible.
If you fall: Stop the harm when you see it, and apologize if possible. Do not wait for a spotless record before returning.
After the prayer, his father greeted half the neighborhood, just as Karim had expected. Then they came out. The white car was still there, its driver standing beside the open door. The prayer was over. The road was still blocked. Karim walked beside his father and asked quietly, “If someone else parked like this outside a shop to buy something, would you accept it from him?” His father did not answer. He took out his key, raised a hand in apology to the driver, and moved the car to the corner of the street. The white car passed, followed by the cars trapped behind it. Karim got in beside his father. Neither spoke all the way home.
On Karim’s next visit, on Friday, his father knocked on his door half an hour before the call to prayer. “Come on.” He parked behind the bakery, away from the narrow street, switched off the engine, and said, “Five minutes on foot.” They walked to the mosque and arrived before the preacher climbed the pulpit.
Who are you when you make a promise? Do you protect the time of people who know you, or also that of people whose names you do not know? Before your next appointment, identify one thing someone else can use without you getting in their way. Your argument does not change their right.
When he returned to his dorm room on Saturday evening, Karim ran a finger along the edge of the drawer. The envelope was inside, just as he had left it. For the first time, he was not afraid of what it held. He did not open the drawer. He began unpacking his bag.
References (2)
- 1Muslim, Sahih, The Book of Clothing and Adornment, hadith 2121a, narrated by Abu Sa‘id al-Khudri; the wording follows Muslim. Also al-Bukhari, Sahih, The Book of Oppressions, hadith 2465. Muslim’s narration; Al-Bukhari’s narration.
- 2Muslim, Sahih, The Book of Faith, hadith 35b, narrated by Abu Hurayrah, on the branches of faith. Hadith text.